Can anybody confirm that Shapely reaps better performance with the GEOS trunk?
Begin forwarded message: > From: strk <[email protected]> > Date: December 9, 2009 9:59:04 AM CEST > To: GEOS Development List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.1 vs 3.2 > Reply-To: GEOS Development List <[email protected]> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:12:38PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: >> Not sure what this means, but: > >> ---- 3.1 ---- > ---- 3.2 ---- >>> >> Files: 20 > Files: 58 >> Tests: 2216 > Tests: 3582 >> Failed: 0 > Failed: 0 >> Succeeded: 2216 > Succeeded: 3582 >> PASS: testrunner > PASS: testrunner >>> >> real 0m29.194s > real 0m11.558s >> user 0m24.750s > user 0m10.630s >> sys 0m1.489s > sys 0m0.230s > > Much more tests in less of half the time ! > It seems to mean 3.2.0 rocks :) > > --strk; > > Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer () ASCII Ribbon Campaign > http://foo.keybit.net/~strk/services.html /\ Keep it simple! > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel -- Sean _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
