On 9.11.2010 21:47, Ken Watford wrote: > I believe so as well. It's more of a distutils issue than a setuptools > issue - since there are no extension modules, it doesn't realize that > the egg needs to be platform specific. The -p option is used to > specify the platform name but it seems to only take effect if the > distribution is non-pure. And I'm not sure if there's a way to trick > it into believing it's non-pure. > > Might as well just rename them by hand, I guess.
Maybe this time, but in future I should add -p option to my script. > > Since you have the 64-bit DLLs, could you provide 64-bit eggs as well? > Looks like you've just got one architecture there, and without the > suffix it's not obvious which. > Ah yes, forgot about that. This will generate a lot of files however (6 eggs vs 2 installers). I'm not sure if that is necessary or if it is somehow possible for egg to only use a single file for all different supported versions of Python (2.5, 2.6, and 2.7). Thanks, Jaakko _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
