Not a problem. I will not think any differently of anyone. I just wanted to argue my point a little more.
I suppose, like him, I'm not afraid to speak my mind. Consider the issue closed. Dan Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: > On 11/17/06 1:49 PM, "Dan Koester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I didn't realize there were such strong feelings towards these ideas... >> I do see the reasons for the reply-to address... but the subject line >> doesn't make sense to me at all. I feel it's a huge advantage to add a >> prefix that is well known. > > Dan, > > Please don't take any of this personally. Stefan's a great guy and like so > many really technical people, he not afraid to speak his mind and get > straight to the point. Which, IMHO, is a good thing. > > We haven't heard much complaints over this issue because it really is the > standard on Free Software mailing lists. Most email clients have rules that > can be set on any header field to filter this automatically. Let us know if > you need help! > > And thanks again for your interest in OpenMoko! > > -Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenMoko community mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
