On 12/9/06, Paul Bohme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would like to avoid similar again, if at all possible. Loading firmware into a device is no big deal - it doesn't link into any other code so might as well be any random opaque blob of data. Having to deal with the contortions involved when one of the modules you need is pinned in time while the rest of the system is straining to grow is something else entirely.
Logical and reasoned argument like that above, is one thing. Turning it into an ethical issue implies that there is an ethical absolute which imbues ones opinion or preference with more 'correctness' than the next persons opinion or preference or logical argument. For example, it would be possible to support a even a 1.x closed-source, binary module in any kernel release version you wish. You might have to perform some really ugly hacks to ensure this backwards compatibility, and it may even affect overall system performance - but it's still a pragmatic choice - the Zaurus was stuck on principle, the unwillingness to invest significant kernel changes or compromises because of a closed-source module. But I don't think there is a 'right' or 'wrong' way here - everyone is free to choose what amount of closed-source software they are comfortable with. I'm just not comfortable seeing ethics and philosophy used as intellectual sledgehammers to crush dissenting viewpoints. It's not exactly honest! Richard _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
