On 1/20/07 1:18 PM, "Dave Crossland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/01/07, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dave Crossland schreef: >>> Can the FIC marketting department call it 'the OpenMoko GNU/Linux >>> Distribution'? >> >> How much GNU software must be present to call it a GNU/linux distribution? Do >> I still need >> to call it gnu/linux if I use uclibc and busybox? > > Looking back at the annoucement, I see: > >>>> * gcc 4.1.1 >>>> * binutils 2.17.50.0.5 >>>> * glibc 2.4 >>>> * glib 2.6.4 >>>> * gtk 2.6.10 > > So IMO this is clearly a GNU/Linux system. More than it's a "GTK/GNU/Linux" system...? Or an "X/GTK/GNU/Linux" system...? Or a "list your favorite twenty components/X/GTK/GNU/Linux" system...? This is silly stuff, in my opinion. If the Free Software Foundation wants to call something "GNU/Linux" that badly, let 'em put together their own distribution and call it whatever they like. _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
