On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:55, Richard Franks wrote: > The distinction may become more relevant if you get hit with a cease and > desist - "YouTube has blocked a small company from making YouTube videos > available on mobile phones": > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/23/youtube_blocks_mobile_video_encoder >/ > > If we have a browser with Flash support capable of displaying YouTube > video, and then run it on the Neo.. are we suddenly going to have to > worry about litigation such as this company did?
Not a problem - it's just a browser. This company was transcoding the video. Running your own transcoding proxy is probably fine, but start doing it as a service to others and you could have a problem. Getting a flash-capable browser will be another problem entirely... > > "We were informed by YT their action was largely due to pressure from > their new mobile partner, Verizon." > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenMoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
