On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 12:04 +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:11:53AM -0800, Dimitris Kogias wrote: > > Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: > > > On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip? > > > > > > Sure. We're using a Ti Calypso chipset. Unfortunately this stuff is all > > > under _super_ NDA :-( > > > > Isn't the AT-capable port going to be available to userland via a serial > > abstraction? If so, its AT command profile won't be a secret very long. > > there's nothing secret about that AT command profile. The chipset > supports all of the mandatory ETSI GSM TS 07.07 commands (use > http://pda.etsi.org/pda/queryform.asp to get it), plus some of the > optional ones. > > This GSM standard even has a command that lists the list of available > commands (AT+CLAC). See attachment. > > There are some vendor-specific, proprietary TI AT commands which will > remain undocumented. But none of them are required for regular phone > usage (including SMS, MMS, FAX, GPRS, Voice Call, Data Call (CSD), etc.) > > So I really don't understand all this fuzz. It's really very much > standard compliant.
Wild guess: some of "vendor-specific, proprietary TI AT commands" allow user to write/read GSM module flash. This is probably illegal in many countries. No surprise whole datasheet is under "super NDA" ;-) -- Aloril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
