On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Mike Hodson wrote:
On 2/16/07, Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was about to post to gizmodo a few hours ago, thanks for reminding me
> :)
Or not...considering I didn't realize their comment system was open to
invitee's only. Bleh. closed comment pool = not worth my time reading
any more. All hail openness...from phones to comments!
Look for it on Digg - I think digg points to the gizmodo article, and anyone
can join digg and post comments.
I think it is VERY important to comment on the gizmodo article (even via
digg)
because the comments have taken some misconceptions and then built upon them,
giving an overall negative impression. I think it's very important to make
clear, factual, very accurate responses to this article, and to avoid getting
into an argument with other commentators about whether the iPhone is better
than the Neo 1973 or not.
While I agree with you that gizmodo is not where I would turn for info,
others
may go there. It is a popular site.
Forgive my error. I think the troubling post was on engadget. At any rate, I
think my comments are still valid in general, and we may see more posts like
this that would be good to respond to.
Michael
_______________________________________________
OpenMoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
