Hey Jeff, I was going to mention sphinx (or even a lumenvox installation), but this would require people to have an asterisk installation if they were going to run this application.
An ASP service will always offer more accuracy and functionality and needn't be too expensive. Hell if you are going to install asterisk on a home server may as well buy a Mexuar Corraleta license (www.mexuar.com) so you can do the calls via a browser :) http://www.mexuar.com/downloads/Level1Products/CorraletaDemoSound.swf Regards, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +1-917-207-3420 Mb > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeff > Sent: Monday, 26 February 2007 8:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Voice Activated Controls > > Dean Collins wrote: > > The answer is no, the neo processing power is too limited. > > Or perhaps the answer is more like "maybe". ;) I'm still holding my breath for > pocketsphinx... The page does say it works with StrongARM, which if I'm > reading wikipedia correctly was just 206MHz. > > > You need to start thinking bigger guys. > > > > Why does the processing need to occur on the handset itself? What about > > building a 'cloud' application where the application and processing > > occurs with only a sip or gsm connection to the handset? > > > > Check out http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Tellme for an idea on what > > I am describing. > > This is a nice idea to offload processing to another box and spit back the > results. One big problem I have with the Tellme approach is that it isn't free > as it's using some service provider. Blah for me there. That said, there's no > reason the ideas behind it couldn't be implemented freely. > > I've done speech recognition with sphinx and asterisk. It doesn't work too > great--the main problem being that GSM is a pretty low quality sample for it to > work with. You know how you can never understand anyone talking on a cell > phone? ;) Well, sphinx can't understand it too well either. But pocketsphinx > (which I haven't tried) lists on their page "telephone-bandwidth models"--this > looks promising. > > For SIP, you need some sort of net connection, of course, and I think we can > assume that that is coming. Then you can use alaw/ulaw instead of GSM and that > will help recognition quite a bit... > > -Jeff / #jebba > > _______________________________________________ > OpenMoko community mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
