Martin Raißle napisał(a):
On 3/2/07, Jonathon Suggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In combination of what was said before - the virus scanner - we could
maybe use a database of application hashes, so not every app has to be
configurated but only those that are not found in the database, maybe
this will bring some focus to security to the average user, since not
every app goes along with a warning.
If there are too many warnings user tend to grant any right to any app.
I'm afraid that you're going a bit too far. I thought about making costs
with illegal calls and smses. Virus protection should appear only when
viruses appear. Otherwise scanner would kill system's performance (as
NAV do in my computer and I always disable it while not installing
unknown apps).
Think about average users. They don't need rating. They sometimes even
don't know exactly what spam is. It has to be as simple as possible.
--
*Bartłomiej Zdanowski*
Programista
Dział Rozwoju Produktów
AutoGuard & Insurance Sp. z o.o.
Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego
Rejestru Sądowego
KRS: 0000029534
NIP PL1132219747
ul. Omulewska 27
04-128 Warszawa
tel. +48 22 611 69 23
www.autoguard.pl <http://www.autoguard.pl>
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Bart=C5=82omiej Zdanowski
n;quoted-printable:Zdanowski;Bart=C5=82omiej
org;quoted-printable:AutoGuard & Insurance Sp. z o.o.;Dzia=C5=82 Rozwoju Produkt=C3=B3w
adr:;;ul. Omulewska 27;Warszawa;;04-128;Polska
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Programista AC2
tel;work:022 611 69 23
tel;cell:603 525 105
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.autoguard.pl
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
OpenMoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
