On 7/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:25:09PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Mikko Rauhala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ti, 2007-07-17 kello 09:59 +0200, ramsesoriginal kirjoitti:
> >> p.s. i hate the way gmail handles this list. couldn't we have the
> >> respond-to adress set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> it's nothing to do with gmail. the reply-to field has not been set on
> the openmoko mail server, so replies to messages default to the
> sender. this is fine in most cases, but not on mailing lists
Hi Robin
Actually, it is perfectly fine on mailing lists, and in fact it's exactly
the way it's supposed to be. This is an old debate, and, like Mikko, I don't
want to waste list cycles rehashing it, but Chip Rosenthal's early paper
(http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) lays out the issues. There
have been some rebuttals over the years, but see
thanks for the info. yes, i see the way it should be done now. the
woozle link was very helpful and the one at unicom
_______________________________________________
OpenMoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
