On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>>> OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place. >>> >>> -2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point. > > Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software versions > (mainly talking about stable releases).
I agree. wasn't my idea. In any case, it is what is in place now. > It psychologically forces you to do one major release every year. that's not true. > *every* new stable release should run on *all* older hardware (at least up > to 3 or 4 years!). this is an entirely different discussion and I would rather not want to mix that with the naming/versioning scheme debate. -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/ ============================================================================ Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
