Crane, Matthew writes: >Yea, I got the 32 number from another wikipedia page, I didn't infer it >from the name. I don't think it has much really to do with 32bits >either for that matter, likely the "32" was entirely a marketing >distinction.
No, the 32 means that the FAT entries are 32 bits (in contrast to the earlier FAT aka FAT12 and FAT16 filesystems). >But that doesn't matter, the important thing here is that Micro$oft >sucks. That's a separte issue :) _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
