On 6/5/08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 18:05:47 Mark wrote: > > Robert Schuster theBohemian at gmx.net wrote on Tue Jun 3 18:10:18 CEST > > 2008 > > > > >Hi. > > > > > >flexd schrieb: > > >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) skrev: > > >>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:12:30 -0400 "Lally Singh" <lally.singh at > > >>> gmail.com> babbled: > > >>> > > >>> the day nvidia comes with open drivers for this... we can begin to take > > >>> an interest :) > > >> > > >> To be honest, (i myself do not really care if the drivers are open or > > >> not, i do not have the require level of geekyness to change them :p) i > > >> couldnt care less if the drivers are open or not. > > >>There are many reasons to have FOSS drivers. The ability for non-kernel > > >>non-gfx people to change them is very low priority. But the kernel and > > >>gfx people care much more. > > >> > > >> Aslong as we/someone could run a opensource OS on it, such as OM, i'd > > >> love it! > > > > > >Yeah and for this a free/open driver is a precondition. > > > > > >Regards > > >Robert > > > > If that were true, the Neo/Freerunner wouldn't exist. It's quite > > obvious that for the foreseeable future some compromises are > > unavoidable if you want a usable, worthwhile device. > > Not at all obvious to me. > > :M:
I agree with Michael. The only reason I want a Freerunner, is because it is open. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
