i think the word "minimum" in this context applied to the number of lists, not the list content or the number of people on the list.
if the list has a tight focus i feel very comfortable telling people to move unrelated conversations elsewhere. i'm happy to enforce this, but i prefer to keep the list unmoderated. Josh Monson wrote: > I was thinking moderated to keep noise down on the wiki list, so that > it's clean and efficient communication between the editors so we can > coordinate what we are doing. A lot of people blanket send to all lists, > or send irrelevant information. The input from the community would be > taken from the community list, etc....but either way I suppose we'll get > the job done. > > There was talk about someone at OM already trying to minimize the lists, > so I figured keeping the wiki-editors list to a minimum may help with > that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Reese > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:56 AM > To: List for Openmoko community discussion > Subject: Re: Wiki editors > > Josh Monson wrote: >> Thanks Michael... >> >> I agree with your vision of this list being used for coordination only >> amongst ourselves. This list may need to be moderated as far as >> membership goes, with input from the community entering via the >> community list as you state. > > I'm not sure it should be a moderated list. That goes against the point > > of a community effort to improve and maintain the wiki. That said, I > think that the wiki@ list should only be for planning and discussion > pertaining to wiki maintenance, but should always welcome input on the > topic from community members. > _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
