Quoting arne anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think the more changes in basic packages as gtk+<-> gtk+-fastscaling there are, the superior the packetmanagement has to be. Resolving the dependencies, removing old files and so on. I am not sure if opkg can do the job perfectly that you have the same result as a clean imagerather a case for improving opkg, isn't it?
Although improving is always a good idea, this would be the case when my thoughts, that taking an fairly old image and updating with opkg could cause trouble, are correct. I don't know if they are.
So the question should be is this method (image + opkg upgrade) in our special case, opkg as a packetmanagement tool and the rapid changes of ASU, the best solution?
If I am wrong and this is the way to go, I am more than happy with it.
binNfAlh6RV3F.bin
Description: PGP Public Key
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
