NeilBrown escreveu: > On Mon, September 1, 2008 6:59 pm, Yorick Moko wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Lorn Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> They certainly are not in our copy of the calypso spec's that we got >>> directly from TI. If it is, I must be missing it, and haven't found it. >> Maybe TI just wants their products to suck? >> What I mean: is this standard practice in this business? What possible >> gain would TI have with not giving you that information? > > They could avoid having to pay the extra cost of getting a competent and > thorough documentation writer? > > Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by > incompetence!!
You can have other explanations which are neither malice nor incompetence. - That command might be broken or incomplete in some way, so it's not documented. - That command might be meant for internal debugging only, so it's not documented. I came up with these two in less than a minute. We can probably easily think of other valid justifications. -- Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
