Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > It's important though that people > understand why we need all these abstractions. It's not because we love high > level interfaces, it's because we need to prepare for application > _integration_.
Yea, but there are things which are already solved and people are used to work with them. Integration could well go over the top. As i probably already said. I like the effort, but some things are better left alone. :) Not that i have some spcific critique right now, but i could easyly see fso going in that direction. That's why i reacted this way in this case, i thought it had happened. *g* I see fso walking a fine line between genius and insanity. :) settingsd vs. gconf would be one of these cases. I just refused to really think about it yet, so i don't really know how much sense it makes. I think i would not like the outcome... (gconf is horrible, but it was there long enough to be considered a standard...) pimd vs. eds the same... -- Drucken Sie diese Mail bitte nur auf Recyclingpapier aus. Please print this mail only on recycled paper. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community