Tilman Baumann wrote: > And for the wakeup stuff. Well besides at there is not much of a stable > interface i guess, besides some acpi and nvram cruft. > I guess a dbus interface suits well for that. But needs to be more > abstract (register timer for callback/signal, remove timer). :) > But somehow i can't get the at command out of my head...
I would hope that framework services like registering a wakeup would not require the overhead of starting a shell to run an 'at' command :-) -- Rod _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community