Right now there are a couple of loose dependencies, so that will have to be removed in the 0.2 which will have a different architecture. But other than that, I don't plan to exclude the Debian distro from this project.
Thanks, Paul On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > great effort and a good example of community driven invention! > > Will the project be available to the debian distro too or in other > words, are there hard dependencies on the 2008.x distros? > > Cheers > > /peter > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > ICQ 18762544 > Phone +46704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Paul V. Borza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> A couple of people asked me whether I will or won't continue my >> project on accelerometer-based gestures. >> My answer was always yes, and to make that clear, I've bought >> accelsense.com, and accelsense.org. >> The code has moved from http://code.google.com/p/accelges/ into a GIT >> repository located at http://repo.accelsense.org. >> >> I'm now in the first year of masters, and I've managed to get two of >> my courses into the accelerometer-based gestures (i.e. to implement >> this as homework). >> From now on, my professors require me to use SOMs (i.e. >> self-organizing maps, a type of neural networks), instead of hidden >> Markov models. >> >> A couple of you guys asked whether the efficiency and speed can be >> improved using HMMs. Again, the answer is yes, just that I don't have >> time to work on the HMM implementation anymore. >> >> Just wanted to let you know that from now on, I'll focus exclusively >> on working with the Neo, rather than the Wii to test the gestures; and >> make them smooth and natural. >> Nokia is using SOMs for gesture recognition in mobile phones, so we >> should be on the technology wave as I can tell (still, I'm just one >> guy). >> >> What I'll focus on in the 0.2 release: >> * use some code from the rotate application that is flying around. >> * keep the current Dbus system for interaction. >> * 10% of CPU (it's now using 20%), and yes it's doable. >> * no GUI, but change the text console UI to be something like 'top', >> and not just printf hundreds of xyz data. >> * reintegrate with matlab-compatible diagrams. >> * will still be in C99 and under LGPL. >> * math formulas that are used in code will have a link to >> http://wiki.accelsense.org/wiki/<page> and the formula will be written >> in LaTex. >> * some of you gave me advices on how to improve the organization of >> the project, will also do that. >> * some dependencies aren't checked, there are too many you say, will be >> removed. >> * integration with the freesmartphone.org Dbus FSO communication >> system (I've seen that it grew since I last checked it). >> * implementation of self-organizing maps. >> >> Bottom line: I'll be trying turn it in a mature project ;) >> >> You can do interesting things with SOMs, like Nokia was doing: >> detecting when the user climbs down, up or walks, just using an >> accelerometer. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openmoko community mailing list >> community@lists.openmoko.org >> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > -- Paul V. Borza _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
