On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:51:07PM +0100, Damien Thébault wrote: > 2008/11/21 Al Iasid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > IMHO having to dig out a stylus (pen) or use my fingernail is not nearly as > > convenient or enjoyable as a finger-friendly interface. I don't min hi res > > or low res - or big or small screen size - as long as the interface is > > finger-friendly. The cell phone is our most "intimate" personal device. > > There should be no intermediary in the user interface. > > I don't really care about using my fingernails, they are always available, but > I don't like to use a stylus since I have to find it in the first place. > (maybe if the stylus was hidden in the case it would be a little better, but > this uses space and it takes more time than fingernails) > > The primary isses I have with the actual touchscreen is the UI reactivity, > I don't know if it's because the touchscreen is slow or because the software > is. > > I agree that a borderless phone would be more practical touchscreen-wise. > If this implies using a hard screen, implying capacitive, then why not.
If you try out sketch, you see that it's responsive enough and detailed enough for making a written signature :) -- Grudnuk demand sustenance! Today is Setting Orange, the 33rd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3174 + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community