>> ext2/3 is not really suited to storing such a large number of small >> files.
afaik ext3 can be configured to use small files. > (I don't understand why ext2/3 is used at all these days, as it has > been obsolete for years. that's nonsense. > Except for one bug 8 years ago[1], ReiserFS has worked flawlessly for me > on my desktop systems.) i use ext2/3 for over ten years now and never had any problems. if you like reiser better, it's ok, but please don't tell such nonsense only to justify your likings. it's purely a matter of personal preferences, nothing more -- and least of all "extX is bad, reiser is good". _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
