And you think that this is an appropriate forum because.... why?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The Jewish State of Israel has no constitution, nor does it name its borders.
> Israel's hidden constitution is Judaism. Israel's undeclared borders range
> from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers. Israel's desired jurisdiction extends
> over the entire Earth.
>
> It could not be more clear that the Jewish State follows a foreign policy
> which obeys Jewish Law as iterated in the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud,
> Maimonedes, the Cabalah, and the many commentaries and refinements of same.
> The Jews are genociding the native inhabitants of Palestine, just as their
> religion advises, and because their religion teaches them to do so. They
> treat non-Jews as if non-humans, just as their religion requires them to do.
> They make perpetual war on every nation on Earth, just as their genocidal
> Jewish God has instructed.
>
> The Jews of Israel are simply being Jews. Jews are an existential threat to
> the human race.
>
> Israel contains one third of the Jews of the World. It is not some aberration
> of the Jewish spirit, but the condensation and concentration of the perverse
> Jewish mentality, which malady also pervades the remaining two thirds of
> Jewry, who almost unanimously support the Jewish State, and who certainly do
> unanimously support the Jewish People and its consistent and constant crimes
> against the human race. Israel is Jewry and the danger of Israel is the
> danger of the Jewish People to all others, as the Jews have demonstrated each
> and every day of their existence.
>
> The Jews, the entire Jewish People of 15 million, will not relent until they
> have wiped out all non-Jews in "Greater Israel". They will not stop
> destroying all other cultures, nations, religions, ethnicities, races,
> competition, etc. until they are either stopped, or succeed in their ancient
> quest to destroy the human race.
>
> What Israel is doing is not some reaction to outside forces, nor was the
> formation of Israel a response to the Holocaust. Israel is simply following
> the plan laid out in the Jews' religious texts. The Jews have openly planned
> to take Palestine and genocide the native population of Palestine for some
> 2,500 years before the Holocaust. The Jews have openly complained that
> "anti-Semitism" is a threat that gives them the right to genocide the
> Palestinians, not merely since the advent of Nazism, but for some 2,500 years.
>
> The Jewish religion is the Constitution of the Jewish State of Israel, and,
> to a greater or lesser extent, the constitution of the nature of every Jew
> alive. The borders of Israel are the range the Jew roams over the entire
> World. The perverse Jewish mentality is inbred by a Jew's exposure to his
> parents and to his community. Judaism passes in the spit and slobber of
> Jewish mother telling her Jewish child that he is a "Jew", as much as Judaism
> passes in the poison and pain of a Talmudic tractate. The secular Jews did
> not suddenly come to life after the Enlightenment and the Jewish Reformation
> a body of vampires that appeared ex nihilo, in vacuo, mostly atheistical and
> undetached from formally practiced Judaism. Judaism is the Jew. It is a
> mindset that transcends and supercedes religion. It is a belief set, a way of
> life, a perception of one's self and one's relation to the World that makes a
> Jew, a Jew, and a danger to all of humanity.
>
> In fact, the religious shell of Judaism is like the stretched and infected
> skin of a lycanthropic pustule. When you lance it to cure the infection, the
> virus only becomes more contagious and spills directly on the non-Jew.
>
> The secular Jew is a deliberate product of the hyper-religious Jew, a monster
> created out of the hewed corpses of the fanatically religious Jew, a Golem
> which is conjured up to enter the World of the non-Jew and poison its blood,
> and boil its brain with a rabid lunacy that bites and spreads, until the
> infected community feeds on itself and fills the fields with rotting bloating
> bodies, where once human beings tilled the soil and tended to their families.
> The religious Jew created the secular Jew as an army of Esthers who seduce
> with open thighs, broad smiles, and a Siren call that lures in the non-Jew to
> cast his skull upon the jagged rocks and color the seas with his blood,
> sickened and blinded by the venereal disease of Judaism in secular form.
>
> Israel is not a secular democracy. It is a religious mockery. It is a rabid
> bat flying to the ends of the Earth, to end the Earth. No one will be free
> nor safe until the disease is quarantined and dies out.
>
> Source:
> http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/israel/how_can_israel_claim_to_be_a_%27democracy%27_when_it_has_no_constitution_nor_borders?/`
>
> --------------------
>
> The problem with intellectually insecure whites
>
> Kevin MacDonald
>
> January 19, 2009
>
> America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired state of
> affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and shape public
> opinion. But it certainly creates some management issues — at least in the
> long run. After all, it's difficult to come up with an historical example of
> a nation with a solid ethnic majority (90% white in 1950) that has
> voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural power. Such
> transformations are typically accomplished by military invasions, great
> battles, and untold suffering.
>
> And it's not as if everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view their own
> demographic and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative. Indeed, as I have
> noted previously, it is striking that racial nationalism has triumphed in
> Israel at the same time that the Jewish intellectual and political movements
> and the organized Jewish community have been the most active and effective
> force for a non-white America. Indeed, a poll in 2008 found that Avigdor
> Lieberman was the second most popular politician in Israel. Lieberman has
> advocated expulsion of Arabs from Israel and has declared himself a follower
> of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leading pioneer of racial Zionism. The most
> popular politician in the poll was Benjamin Netanyahu — another admirer of
> Jabotinsky. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni are
> also Jabotinskyists.
>
> The racial Zionists are now carrying out yet another orgy of mass murder
> after a starvation-inducing blockade and the usual triggering assault
> designed to provoke Palestinian retaliation — which then becomes the cover
> for claims that Israel is merely defending itself against terrorism. This
> monstrosity was approved by overwhelming majorities of both Houses of
> Congress. The craven Bush administration did its part by abstaining from a UN
> resolution designed by the US Secretary of State as a result of a personal
> appeal by the Israeli Prime Minister. This is yet another accomplishment of
> the Israel Lobby, but one they would rather not have discussed in public.
> People might get the impression that the Lobby really does dictate US foreign
> policy in the Mideast. Obviously, such thoughts are only entertained by
> anti-Semites.
>
> But I digress.
>
> In managing the eclipse of white America, one strategy of the mainstream
> media is to simply ignore the issue. Christopher Donovan ("For the media,
> the less whites think about their coming minority status, the better") has
> noted that the media, and in particular, the New York Times, are quite
> uninterested in doing stories that discuss what white people think about this
> state of affairs.
>
> It's not surprising that the New York Times — the Jewish-owned flagship of
> anti-white, pro-multicultural media — ignores the issue. The issue is also
> missing from so-called conservative media even though one would think that
> conservatives would find the eclipse of white America to be an important
> issue. Certainly, their audiences would find it interesting.
>
> Now we have an article "The End of White America" written by Hua Hsu, an
> Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College. The article is a rather
> depressing display of what passes for intellectual discourse on the most
> important question confronting white people in America.
>
> Hsu begins by quoting a passage in F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby in
> which a character, Tom Buchanan, states: "Have you read The Rise of the
> Colored Empires by this man Goddard?" … Well, it's a fine book, and everybody
> ought to read it. The idea is if we don't look out the white race will
> be—will be utterly submerged. It's all scientific stuff; it's been proved."
>
> Buchanan's comment is a thinly veiled reference to Lothrop Stoddard's The
> Rising Tide of Color which Hsu describes as "rationalized hatred" presented
> in a scholarly, gentlemanly, and scientific tone. (This wording that will
> certainly help him when he comes up for tenure.) As Hsu notes, Stoddard had a
> doctorate from Harvard and was a member of many academic associations. His
> book was published by a major publisher. It was therefore "precisely the kind
> of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan's profile — wealthy, Ivy
> League–educated, at once pretentious and intellectually insecure — might have
> been expected to bring up in casual conversation."
>
> Let's ponder that a bit. The simple reality is that in the year 2009 an Ivy
> League-educated person, "at once pretentious and intellectually insecure,"
> would just as glibly assert the same sort of nonsense as Hsu. To wit:
>
> The coming white minority does not mean that the racial hierarchy of American
> culture will suddenly become inverted, as in 1995's White Man's Burden, an
> awful thought experiment of a film, starring John Travolta, that envisions an
> upside-down world in which whites are subjugated to their high-class black
> oppressors. There will be dislocations and resentments along the way, but the
> demographic shifts of the next 40 years are likely to reduce the power of
> racial hierarchies over everyone's lives, producing a culture that's more
> likely than any before to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than
> members of a caste or identity group.
>
> The fact is that no one can say for certain what multicultural America
> without a white majority will be like. There is no scientific or historical
> basis for claims like "the demographic shifts of the next 40 years are likely
> to reduce the power of racial hierarchies over everyone's lives, producing a
> culture that's more likely than any before to treat its inhabitants as
> individuals, rather than members of a caste or identity group."
>
> Indeed, there is no evidence at all that we are proceeding to a color blind
> future. The election results continue to show that white people are
> coalescing in the Republican Party, while the Democrats are increasingly the
> party of a non-white soon-to-be majority.
>
> Is it so hard to believe that when this coalition achieves a majority that it
> will further compromise the interests of whites far beyond contemporary
> concerns such as immigration policy and affirmative action? Hsu anticipates a
> colorblind world, but affirmative action means that blacks and other
> minorities are certainly not treated as individuals. And it means that whites
> — especially white males — are losing out on opportunities they would have
> had without these policies and without the massive non-white immigration of
> the last few decades.
>
> Given the intractability of changing intelligence and other traits required
> for success in the contemporary economy, it is unlikely that 40 more years of
> affirmative action will attain the outcomes desired by the minority lobbies.
> Indeed, in Obama's America, blacks are rioting in Oakland over perceived
> racial injustices, and from 2002–2007, black juvenile homicide victims
> increased 31%, while black juvenile homicide perpetrators increased 43%.
> Hence, the reasonable outlook is for a continuing need for affirmative
> action and for racial activism in these groups, even after whites become a
> minority.
>
> Whites will also lose out because of large-scale importation of relatively
> talented immigrants from East Asia. Indeed, as I noted over a decade ago,
> "The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian
> technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite."
>
> Hsu shows that there already is considerable anxiety among whites about the
> future. An advertizing executive says, "I think white people feel like
> they're under siege right now — like it's not okay to be white right now,
> especially if you're a white male. ... People are stressed out about it. 'We
> used to be in control! We're losing control'" Another says, "There's a lot of
> fear and a lot of resentment."
>
> It's hard to see why these feelings won't increase in the future.
>
> A huge problem for white people is lack of intellectual and cultural
> confidence. Hsu quotes Christian (Stuff White People Like) Lander saying, "I
> get it: as a straight white male, I'm the worst thing on Earth." A professor
> comments that for his students "to be white is to be culturally broke. The
> classic thing white students say when you ask them to talk about who they are
> is, 'I don't have a culture.' They might be privileged, they might be loaded
> socioeconomically, but they feel bankrupt when it comes to culture … They
> feel disadvantaged, and they feel marginalized."
>
> This lack of cultural confidence is no accident. For nearly 100 years whites
> have been subjected to a culture of critique emanating from the most
> prestigious academic and media institutions. And, as Hsu points out, the most
> vibrant and influential aspect of American popular culture is hip-hop—a
> product of the African American urban culture.
>
> The only significant group of white people with any cultural confidence
> centers itself around country music, NASCAR, and the small town values of
> traditional white America. For this group of whites — and only this group —
> there is "a racial pride that dares not speak its name, and that defines
> itself through cultural cues instead—a suspicion of intellectual elites and
> city dwellers, a preference for folksiness and plainness of speech (whether
> real or feigned), and the association of a working-class white minority with
> 'the real America.'"
>
> This is what I term implicit whiteness — implicit because explicit assertions
> of white identity have been banned by the anti-white elites that dominate our
> politics and culture. It is a culture that, as Hsu notes, "cannot speak its
> name."
>
> But that implies that the submerged white identity of the white working class
> and the lack of cultural confidence exhibited by the rest of white America
> are imposed from outside. Although there may well be characteristics of
> whites that facilitate this process, this suppression of white identity and
> interests is certainly not the natural outcome of modernization or any other
> force internal to whites as a people. In my opinion, it is the result of the
> successful erection of a culture of critique in the West dominated by Jewish
> intellectual and political movements.
>
> The result is that educated, intellectually insecure white people these days
> are far more likely to believe in the utopian future described by Hsu than in
> hard and cautious thinking about what the future might have in store for them.
>
> It's worth dwelling a bit on the intellectual insecurity of the whites who
> mindlessly utter the mantras of multiculturalism that they have soaked up
> from the school system and from the media. Most people do not have much
> confidence in their intellectual ability and look to elite opinion to shape
> their beliefs. As I noted elsewhere,
>
> A critical component of the success of the culture of critique is that it
> achieved control of the most prestigious and influential institutions of the
> West, and it became a consensus among the elites, Jewish and non-Jewish
> alike. Once this happened, it is not surprising that this culture became
> widely accepted among people of very different levels of education and among
> people of different social classes.
>
> Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But they
> know that the professors at Harvard, and the editorial page of the New York
> Times and the Washington Post, and even conservative commentators like Rush
> Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are all on page when it comes to racial and ethnic
> issues. This is a formidable array, to the point that you almost have to be a
> crank to dissent from this consensus.
>
> I think one of the greatest triumphs of the left has been to get people to
> believe that people who assert white identity and interests or who make
> unflattering portrayals of organized Jewish movements are morally degenerate,
> stupid, and perhaps psychiatrically disturbed. Obviously, all of these
> adjectives designate low status.
>
> The reality is that the multicultural emperor has no clothes and, because of
> its support for racial Zionism and the racialism of ethnic minorities in
> America, it is massively hypocritical to boot. The New York Times, the
> academic left, and the faux conservatives that dominate elite discourse on
> race and ethnicity are intellectually bankrupt and can only remain in power
> by ruthlessly suppressing or ignoring the scientific findings.
>
> This is particularly a problem for college-educated whites. Like Fitzgerald's
> Tom Buchanan, such people have a strong need to feel that their ideas are
> respectable and part of the mainstream. But the respectable mainstream gives
> them absolutely nothing with which to validate themselves except perhaps the
> idea that the world will be a better place when people like them no longer
> have power. Hsu quotes the pathetic Christian Lander: ""Like, I'm aware of
> all the horrible crimes that my demographic has done in the world. ... And
> there's a bunch of white people who are desperate — desperate — to say, 'You
> know what? My skin's white, but I'm not one of the white people who's
> destroying the world.'"
>
> As a zombie leftist during the 1960s and 1970s, I know what that feeling of
> desperation is like — what it's like to be a self-hating white. We must get
> to the point where college-educated whites proudly and confidently say they
> are white and that they do not want to become a minority in America.
>
> This reminds me of the recent docudrama Milk, which depicts the life of gay
> activist Harvey Milk. Milk is sure be nominated for an Oscar as Best Picture
> because it lovingly illustrates a triumph of the cultural left. But is has an
> important message that should resonate with the millions of whites who have
> been deprived of their confidence and their culture: Be explicit. Just as
> Harvey Milk advocated being openly gay even in the face of dire consequences,
> whites need to tell their family and their friends that they have an identity
> as a white person and believe that whites have legitimate interests as white
> people. They must accept the consequences when they are harassed, fired from
> their jobs, or put in prison for such beliefs. They must run for political
> office as openly pro-white.
>
> Milk shows that homosexuals were fired from their jobs and arrested for
> congregating in public. Now it's the Southern Poverty Law Center and the rest
> of the leftist intellectual and political establishment that harasses and
> attempts to get people fired. But it's the same situation with the roles
> reversed. No revolution was ever accomplished without some martyrs. The
> revolution that restores the legitimacy of white identity and the legitimacy
> of white interests will be no exception.
>
> But it is a revolution that is absolutely necessary. The white majority is
> foolish indeed to entrust its future to a utopian hope that racial and ethnic
> identifications will disappear and that they won't continue to influence
> public policy in ways that compromise the interests of whites.
>
> It does not take an overactive imagination to see that coalitions of minority
> groups could compromise the interests of formerly dominant whites. We already
> see numerous examples in which coalitions of minority groups attempt to
> influence public policy, including immigration policy, against the interests
> of the whites. Placing ourselves in a position of vulnerability would be
> extremely risky, given the deep sense of historical grievance fostered by
> many ethnic activists and organized ethnic lobbies.
>
> This is especially the case with Jews. Jewish organisations have been
> unanimous in condemning Western societies, Western traditions, and
> Christianity, for past crimes against Jews. Similar sentiments are typical of
> a great many African Americans and Latinos, and especially among the ethnic
> activists from these groups. The "God damn America" sermon by President
> Obama's pastor comes to mind as a recent notorious example.
>
> The precedent of the early decades of the Soviet Union should give pause to
> anyone who believes that surrendering ethnic hegemony does not carry risks.
> The Bolshevik revolution had a pronounced ethnic angle: To a very great
> extent, Jews and other non-Russians ruled over the Russian people, with
> disastrous consequences for the Russians and other ethnic groups that were
> not able to become part of the power structure. Jews formed a hostile elite
> within this power structure — as they will in the future white-minority
> America; Jews were "Stalin's willing executioners."
>
> Two passages from my review of Yuri Slezkine's The Jewish Century seem
> particularly appropriate here. The first passage reminds me of the many
> American Jews who adopt a veneer of support for leftist versions of social
> justice and racial tolerance while nevertheless managing to support racial
> Zionism and the mass murder, torture, and incarceration of the Palestinian
> people in one of the largest prison systems the world has ever seen. Such
> people may be very different when they become a hostile elite in a
> white-minority America.
>
> Many of the commentators on Jewish Bolsheviks noted the "transformation" of
> Jews [after the Bolshevik Revolution]. In the words of [a] Jewish
> commentator, G. A. Landau, "cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed alien to
> a nation so far removed from physical activity." And another Jewish
> commentator, Ia. A. Bromberg, noted that:
>
> the formerly oppressed lover of liberty had turned into a tyrant of
> "unheard-of-despotic arbitrariness"…. The convinced and unconditional
> opponent of the death penalty not just for political crimes but for the most
> heinous offenses, who could not, as it were, watch a chicken being killed,
> has been transformed outwardly into a leather-clad person with a revolver
> and, in fact, lost all human likeness. ...
>
> After the Revolution, ... there was active suppression of any remnants of the
> older order and their descendants. ... The mass murder of peasants and
> nationalists was combined with the systematic exclusion of the previously
> existing non-Jewish middle class. The wife of a Leningrad University
> professor noted, "in all the institutions, only workers and Israelites are
> admitted; the life of the intelligentsia is very hard" (p. 243). Even at the
> end of the 1930s, prior to the Russification that accompanied World War II,
> "the Russian Federation…was still doing penance for its imperial past while
> also serving as an example of an ethnicity-free society" (p. 276). While all
> other nationalities, including Jews, were allowed and encouraged to keep
> their ethnic identities, the revolution remained an anti-majoritarian
> movement.
>
> The difference from the Soviet Union may well be that in white-minority
> America it will not be workers and Israelites who are favored, but non-whites
> and Israelites. Whites may dream that they are entering the post-racial
> utopia imagined by their erstwhile intellectual superiors. But it is quite
> possible that they are entering into a racial dystopia of unimaginable
> cruelty in which whites will be systematically excluded in favor of the new
> elites recruited from the soon-to-be majority. It's happened before.
>
> Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at California State
> University–Long Beach.
>
> Permanent URL with hyperlinks:
>
> http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html
>
> -----------
>
>
> Should Christians Support Israeli Terrorism in Gaza?
>
> A timely discussion between Rev. Ted Pike and Dr. David Duke, one especially
> important for the Christians in our audience
>
> http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukeradio090122DukeandPikeonGaza.mp3
>
> In this vital discussion, Rev. Pike and Dr. Duke explore the Pro-Israel
> attitude of some Christian evangelical organizations, and why their position
> not only goes directly against Christian morality and decency, but actually
> is directly opposite of that expressed by Christian Scriptures. Today, Many
> Christians are instructed that Jews and today's Israel has a special
> covenant" with God. In fact, the New Testament in the clearest of language
> states that the Jews "continued not in my covenant, and I considered them
> not, saith the Lord." Here's the quote that Christians aren't supposed to
> notice.:
>
> 8:10 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, in the day
> when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; because they continued
> not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. (Hebrews 8:10)
>
> They also don't seem to notice that a 2000 year old Judaic war against
> Christianity that has been waged since time of Jesus Christ and still goes on
> today with the most powerful Jewish organizations attempting to destroy
> European and American traditions, that has even become a war on our Christmas
> traditions.
>
> Dr. Duke and Ted Pike also speak about how over a hundred thousand Christian
> Palestinians have suffered with their families from anti-Christian Israel!
> Christian support of Israel has resulted in the very birthplace of Jesus
> Christ, go from 90 percent Palestinian Christians to 35 percent today because
> of Israeli terror and occupation. They ask, "How could any Christian in good
> conscience support the anti-Christian state of Israel, bombing the homes,
> killing and maiming, torturing and oppressing fellow Christian men, women and
> children?"
>
> This is a vital show for every Christian reader and listener of
> DavidDuke.com. Next time, you hear someone say, "God tells us that we must
> support Israel" you will have the clear Christian answer that just the
> opposite is true!
>
> For documentation on this be sure to read some of the well-footnoted, sample
> chapters of Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening.
>
> Source :
>
> http://www.davidduke.com/general/should-christians-support-israeli-terrorism-in-gaza_7282.html
>
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the
> Lawrence Auster
> Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us
> know by calling to 1 212 865 1284
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lawrence Auster,
> 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
> New York, NY 10025
> Contact: [email protected]
> -------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
--
John Dowd
133 Waverley St.
Ottawa Ont. K2P 0V3
Home: (613)234-7884
Cell: (613)316-7884
email: jdowdster at gmail dot com
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
