Johny Tenfinger <[email protected]> writes: >> To make a constructive suggestion: I wonder what the official Openmoko >> view is of SHR Testing? I think it's pretty good, so >> >> - why not help to polish that? >> >> - if not, what _precise_ reasons do OM have for believing that the >> Paroli route will produce (in the near future) something better than >> SHR? > > I'm glad Openmoko is away from SHR - their designers has very strange > ideas and points of view... If you don't know about what I'm talking - > ask raster ;)
Among their properties is also a complete lack of transparency: i don't remember anyone from the community has ever seen any public document or mail (not even talking about IRC discussion) from them. The main UI design decisions weren't put clearly or discussed in public ever before actual implementation existed. Also their goals are completely unknown, given it's quite possible they're aiming for GTA03's capacitive TS they might design an interface largely inadequate for the FreeRunner and GTA01. So, if behind the UI design decisions are the same people who abused Raster, we'd better forget about Paroli and improve SHR for good. IMHO -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
