On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 20:14 +0200, Johny Tenfinger wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 16:35, Francesco de Virgilio > <fradev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think this is the *greatest* fault of OM/SHR since the introduction of > > 2.6.28 kernel. > > It's only one change in path. Nothing more has changed. I'm going to > add functionality of battery.py in SHR Settings.
That's pretty much what I was trying to add to my SHR-Settings, at least the charge control portion.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
