My personal preference goes out to openBmap, because I think they combine quality and quantity; quality: they log the most data (they are even working on TA) quantity: they have all the cells of cellhunter and opencellid
I could be mistaken but from what i heard from onen (the creator of openBmap) on ML and irc, I got the impression that he DOES want to work together, just not "only" sharing data, but i could be wrong y On 6/4/09, Christian Gagneraud <cgagner...@techworks.ie> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using cellhunter since few month, with which i have gathered some > data (1646 cells so far here in Ireland) and uploaded to their server. > I would like to give a try with OpenBmap, is there a way to convert > data from CH to OBM and upload them to OBM server? > I know that OBM log more details than CH but i guess that CH's data > are still usable by OBM. > > Generally speaking, what people think about these two project? And of > course the 2 billion euros/dollars question: Which one is the best? > Does the 2 projects collaborate, if not are there any plan to do so? > > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
