On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 23:24 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:27:22PM +0200, GNUtoo wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 08:19 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:19:07AM +0200, GNUtoo wrote: > > > > > Then I decided to try fso-testing (argh, another two days compiling), > > > > > and I > > > > > was unpleaseantly surprised to see the same error. > > > > > > > > > > What could I be doing wrong? Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > > > Rui > > > > hi, > > > > you seem wanting to install the ipk without its dependencies. > > > > personally I do bitbake package-index,then I push my deploy dir to my > > > > server-router. > > > > Then I do opkg update on the device and install the package with opkg > > > > install $package-name > > > > Denis. > > > > > > Yes, that part I understood, but it is the very first time something like > > > this happened to me. Why isn't it using the proper versions? > > > > There are several possibilities: > > *or the dependences aren't included in fso > > Hardly. it's fso-testing or fso-unstable and the phone had a daily image. > > > *or you use a more up to date fso version than the released one(in > > openembedded) > > How do you get a "more up to date"? Makes no sense. > However it seems it's picking up svn elementary and other E libs. What is > the environment I should use? > > > > Am I not neither on unstable nor testing if using Om2009.06.11 daily? > > > > > > This doesn't make sense, what about if I want to distribute the ipk? > > > > > > What will happen when I want to make a new omnewrotate ipk? The same? > > > > > > For me this means my environment is borked :( > > > > > > Rui > > > Maybe just distribute the dependencies with the ipks? or...better ask > > openembedded or fso or SHR to include your recipe. > > Makes no sense as: > 1. it's not supposed to carry all the subversion files but some more or > less stable releases > 2. why would I send a recipe for software that is so much in development > I may need to add libraries at will? > > > I don't know the process for fso or SHR but for openembedded the > > preferred way is to send a patch to the mailing list > > then ask fso,shr etc... to include your application in your feed,it's > > just a mather of adding the name of your application to the task making > > the feed. > > How can that make sense with an application that's still being developed and > not yet stable enough for a release? > > :( You may want to ask help on the openembedded mailing list then. There was some breakage with the enlightenment libraries some time ago. I didn't understood very well the technical part of the whole story(there were a fix that didn't work,breaking upgrade paths etc...and it was very complicated...not all of us understood it) by the way I only saw svn versions of the enlightenment libraries in org.openenembedded.dev
Denis. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
