Hey!! Is this kind of phrase "i am not interested in c++. " driving the linux phone development? I can never understand how is it possible to have such a huge gap on the scale between C programmers and C++ programmers? Why are C++ programmers dying out? Is it because some C programmers never managed to get the point with C++ and those who did, switched automatically to Java? I propose a C wrapper arround Qt, for the C programmers, and everybody will still benefit, beleive me. QT is a treasure, is a nice clean code! And it is fast!
By the way... nvidia tegra, the new dancer on the stage says "no linux on tegra" http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/06/nvidia-says-no-to-linux-on-tegra-netbooks-chooses-wince.ars or http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=nvidia+tegra+linux mobiphil mobiphil.com On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Al Johnson <[email protected]>wrote: > On Monday 22 June 2009, mobi phil wrote: > >I think carrying Xwindows is the biggest > > mistake. I personally encourage QT or new start with gtk on top of > > www.directfb.org/, so that gtk based interfaces can be reused... By the > way > > did anybody consider gtk with directfb as direction? Or I am wrong and > the > > bottleneck is not really Xwindows? > > This has been discussed _many_ times before. Those with extensive > experience > in this area have said X is not the bottleneck. I've just dug out a few of > Raster's comments: > > http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-April/046056.html > http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-November/035825.html > > http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-devel/2008-February/001924.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > -- being mobile, but including technology http://mobiphil.com
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
