> On GTA02 ogpsd uses UBX only (no NMEA) so the only overhead compared to > omgps would be that the parsing is implemented in python.
I'm sorry that I said ogpsd uses NMEA :( omgps talks with ogpsd (gypsy service) through dbus APIs, so another overhead is delivering of dbus signals. As of my test, the approximate overhead is over 5% (CPU usage). > Do you think that your UBX parser code is ready to replace the python > parser? If yes, then there wouldn't be any problems anymore with using > ogpsd (currently performace/battery usage). No. The Gypsy service good for most users who want to get just data such as lat/lon. Fso-framework manages GPS device, it is not easy to write another working parser (data provider). UBX binary is preferred by omgps because I want full control. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/-omgps--collect-feature-requests-tp3178254p3231221.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
