On 8/6/09, Laszlo KREKACS <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Sebastian > Krzyszkowiak<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 8/5/09, Laszlo KREKACS <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Does that also need, that SHR tries to migrate to 2.6.30 kernel? >>> Currently they are on 2.6.28. >> >> No, SHR is currently on 2.6.29 - it uses newest andy-tracking, so dumb >> battery drivers and few other things are already in SHR. >> > > Whatever. > > 2.6.30 does not work out of box. And if SHR does not want to > migrate over .30, FSO does not get tested against the newest kernel. > > There is a kernel development effort, so significant work has been put > to merge upstream, so I think we should respect them and make > the whole distribution work on the newest .30 kernel. > > I was only interested what is the current desire from SHR and FSO. > > Laszlo
When only 2.6.30/31 becames stable enough, I can't see why it shouldn't be in shr-unstable. -- Sebastian Krzyszkowiak dos _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
