Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:43 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:05:52PM +0200, Marcel wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva > > Seabra: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote: > > > > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009? > > > > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start > > > > yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE > > > > hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stability? > > > > I hate to say this, but in circumstances you are having new > > > > full time > > > > job, it might be worth to abandon OM2009. What to do on SHR? Definitely > > > > take care of _real_ testing branch which would be more stable. This way, > > > > some day maybe we will have SHR release which finally will be totally > > > > stable. > > > > > > SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I > > > used > > > to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot > > > quite easily! > > > > "Days pass without a reboot quite easily" with 2009T5 here, but SHR-U > > didn't even show the PIN entry screen twice... > > Which SHR-U image? That is important, because U is for unstable, but sometimes > it is stable (like 2009/08/08).
I don't remember exactly, was last Friday's image IIRC. Today afternoon I need a working gps device, but I might retry SHR when Paroli is working on it... Don't like the UI of the SHR tel apps. :) _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
