As you want to end the topic - just a very last comment on it: I never asked for any changes on opimd storing - all I said was that it is not using the widely used way of handling phone information (and same time, I was implementing a way to still cope with it).
But I totally agree that we can use our time for more productive things than discussing here ;) ... so have a nice weekend ... PS: The RFC describes format of phone URIs rather than phone numbers. Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote: > On 9/11/09, Michael Pilgermann <kichka...@gmx.de> wrote: >> I was not talking about OPIMD in particular but storing phone >> information in general ... >> >> I understand that you are opimd developer and that you have decided >> about the implementation (in contrast to standard) ... I totally accept >> that and that's why I applied this change to the application. >> >> So long >> Michael > > I just can't understand how other datasources can influence on way of > storing data in opimd. But i think we should end topic, as it's fixed > now ;) And thanks again for your work at opimd support :) > > PS. http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3966 > _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community