Hi everyone!
I have some questions concerning the allocation of FSO resources:
1) If the "Display" resource is allocated (e.g. utilizing fsoraw + application)
the device will not suspend. Other resources (of course except "CPU") do not
show this blocking effect. So why this special handling for "Display"?
Annotation: So the following excerpt of "fsoraw -h" seems to make no sense?!
...
examples:
fsoraw --resources CPU,Display tangogps
...
2) If solely the "CPU" resource is requested I would except that the Display
will blank. This is not the case. Trying to have a pure GPS logger utilizing
"fsoraw --resources CPU tangogps" doesn't bring the expected result. For the
logger scenario a workaround for me was to enable screen-locking instead, but
of course with much higher energy drain than wanted, especially due to
unavoidable touchscreen presses inside my pocket.
Annotation: It seems that Neil Brown did some coding around this problem but I
haven't tested it on current SHR-U yet. Furthermore I think this non blanking
is a general problem (blame me if not).
http://neil.brown.name/blog/20090128025654
http://neil.brown.name/git?p=freerunner;a=blob;f=lock/lock.py;h=9adc658b7081572829f1fc3c866b58b257ccb280;hb=ceb0fdcd0dd60d8c5400bec58df7f0f901665bdc
3) Fsoraw from Nicola Ranaldo does a great job. Unfortunately, it does not
allow to make some resoure re-allocation for already running applications.
Sometimes it may be desired to switch allocation on the fly, without the need
to stop/start the program or without the need to override allocations from
settings menue. Would it make sense to have some kind of resource manager
instead of current fsoraw or should this be done within FSO?
4) One more point concerning "Display" allocation. For me there are three use
cases: a) display blanking (logger), b) display with auto-dimming (tangogps
while riding my bike) c) display always on (navit). Would it be feasible to
pimp fsoraw to have something like this:
ad a) fsoraw -r CPU tangogps
ad b) fsoraw -r CPU,DispDim tangogps
ad c) fsoraw -r CPU,DispNoDim navit
And as I am already writing to the community I've one more question concerning
#2^10
5) Why is ti_calypso_deep_sleep = "never" used by default on SHR instead of
"auto"? Is there a problem with the recamping detection algorithm/procedure?
Cheers,
Boris
--
Neu: GMX DSL bis 50.000 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
