On 10/18/09, Petr Vanek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I get messages like >>>[2009-10-18 07:51:27.107655] Signal : cid=4E91, lac=006A >>>[2009-10-18 07:52:45.145288] Signal : cid=4E7B, lac=006A >>>[2009-10-18 07:53:18.218122] Signal : cid=4E91, lac=006A >>>... >>> So I guess my #1024 is not fixed :-( >> >>The three lines you quoted are not showing #1024. Again, frequent cell >>_handovers_ are perfectly normal. #1024 is about dropping out of a >>cell, then recamping into it, e.g. it looks like that: >> >>[2009-10-18 07:51:27.107655] Signal : cid=4E91, lac=006A >>[2009-10-18 07:52:45.145288] Signal : cid=4E91, lac=006A >>[2009-10-18 07:53:18.218122] Signal : cid=4E91, lac=006A >> >>(NB: This compact debug output form is not optimal for recognizing >>#1024 anyways, you should rather watch for CSQ and CREG messages. If >>CSQ suddenly drops to 99 and you get thrown out of the cell, then it's >>100% clear you have #1024). > > How about this output: > > [2009-10-18 13:37:02.701925] Signal : cid=9E4A, lac=17A2 > [2009-10-18 13:37:26.813505] Signal : cid=7149, lac=17A2 > [2009-10-18 13:41:22.576405] Signal : cid=9E4A, lac=17A2 > [2009-10-18 13:45:48.512750] Signal : cid=7149, lac=17A2 > [2009-10-18 13:49:10.453532] Signal : cid=9E4A, lac=17A2 > > If there is a better way - script of determining whether the 1024 has > been dealt with correctly, it would be helpful... > > thank you > > Petr
Looks normally, not like #1024. -- Sebastian Krzyszkowiak dos _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
