On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:33:12 +0000 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <r...@1407.org> said:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:16:45PM +0300, Gennady Kupava wrote: > > > http://www.rasterman.com/files/ello-elementary-smartq5.mp4 > > > > Thank you for videos, but on high-resolution one we can see exactly same > > slowness as on FreeRunner - exactly! See how top bar slides out on > > close of clock and button test - exacly as on my FreeRunner. Look how > > slow scroll is, again as on FreeRunner! > > I thought it was pretty snappy in comparison with my FreeRunner. But then... > I'm with 16bit software engine, a light theme... so maybe I've even a bit > less peeved at the performance than you are... just what i was saying! :) > Regardless, it's a lot better than in the FreeRunner! indeed. considering its got even more pixels to draw. and thats the 32bit engine there. not the 16bit one. thus you take a hit for the quality (which is far beyond qt's quality which is much like the 16bit engine where it does everything in 16bpp). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community