DJDAS a écrit : > ri...@happyleptic.org wrote: >> The problem is : on the freerunner we merely need something to display some >> simple widgets, scroll the screen smoothly (because on a small display you >> always need to scroll) and be reactive to user finger pressures. If E, >> because >> of an ambitious design, is unable to perform this on the freerunner, then >> it's >> simply not a good fit. You can say that the hardware does not fit E or that E >> does not fit the hardware, the fact is we have much more free software to run >> on the freerunner that free hardware to run E. >> > > Finally! This was my point of view nothing else! :) Thank you for > explaining in a simple manner :) > Bye
But E *is able to perform this*, in a better way than the other solutions. You seem to think E is an ambitious/too complicated/too slow piece of software. You are obviously wrong here. E is an optimized piece of software, probably the best one when you have hard constraints (like on mobile devices). Use a theme with -- as you wrote -- "some simple widgets" and you will see that E is the fastest one. And stop comparing E in SHR/Om2009 (complicated multi layer theme for a not so good look) with QtMoko (simple theme for a good look), because being 2x faster when you display 3x simpler widgets is not significant. Xavier :) _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community