William Kenworthy <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:39 +0100, Petr Vanek wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:32:03 +0000 >> Al Johnson <[email protected]> (AJ) wrote: >> >> >On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Petr Vanek wrote: >> >> >I meant that it ought to behave that way in future, not that it >> >> >would in the current version. I don't care if the phone goes to >> >> >sleep during the snooze interval so long as the alarm goes off >> >> >again five minutes later! >> >> > >> >> :) sure, now it didn't wake up itself and me neither :)) >> >> >> >> what if the unlocking 1-2-3-4 pattern is configurable, how would >> >> snooze get in then? >> > >> >How about puzzle to stop the sound, display the message and show the >> >ACK slider? If you don't ACK then there's another alarm after the >> >snooze interval.
When I implement snoozing (repeating the alarm if not ACK) I consider easy turning off the alarm for the first time (most probably a button), and a puzzle in a snoozed mode (all but first time). >> >> that would do just fine for me, just some people wanted to get rid of >> the puzzle... >> >> Petr >> > > Even without the puzzel, you still need an acknowledge button for the > alarm so thats not a problem. The problem with the puzzel is 4 buttons > with small, unreadable text that have to be pressed in a specific order > when you have just been woken up and are disoriented, cant find your > glasses and your grumpy, just woken up better half is berating you for > the umpteenth time for not being able to turn off the alarm :( The digits could be made bigger. I considered it a feature that until I the digits are blurred means I am not awaken, ie alarm should still play. But the story is of course different when you do not want to wake up the rest of the house. > > BillK _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
