I'm the only one who sees the **big** advantage of navit over tangogps, as being able to work **offline**, with very-easy-to-get maps? You said that tango is "very fast and very efficient at displaying your position". What's the use if the position is displayed on an empty map?
On 1/8/10, KaZeR <ka...@altern.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Le 08/01/2010 09:31, dehqan65 a écrit : > >> 2 - In which issues Tangogps is better than Navit ? > IMO, they both serve different purposes. > > Tango use raster maps. It's very fast and very efficient at displaying > your position and/or track on a raster map. > > Navit use vector maps. Maps are drawn in realtime, which makes it a bit > slower. But this allows routing and turn by turn directions. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community