On Friday 23 April 2010, Peter Mogensen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm about to wake up from having spend the last year being 100% > dependent on a always working phone, so the FR have been on the shelf. > > Now, I'm trying to figure out if I should have the phone #1024 fixed. > > Initial tests on SHR using the deep-sleep-check.py script from the Wiki > and trying the AT-command sequence from handheld-linux.com seems to show > no signs of the bug. > However, when I tried with QtMoko and changed the deep sleep modem conf > Active=never to Active=always, the PIN dialog never came up and QtMoko > just showed a "No network" message. > > So do anyone have pointers to fool-proof 1024 bug detection on QtMoko > and SHR? > > It seems what I've done until now points in 2 different directions.
The QtMoko behaviour seems more like a bug than a manifestation of #1024. Since you don't get as far as entering the PIN it won't try to register. deep-sleep-check.py will show if you suffer from the bug at the time tested, but it is temperature dependent so test it when the phone is warm. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
