On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote: > Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply. > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such > > data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on > > actual paper, then you have something beginning to be believable. > > What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof. > Perlin Quickwriting page: > http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/ > > We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one > and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor > where to find it :-(
Ideally you want something in print with a verifiable publication date. A printed copy of "UIST '98 - Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology" [1] might be available through university libraries if you can't get it direct from ACM. I don't know whether the 'Wired' article [2] made it into the print edition, but that's another one to check. [1] http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/html/proceedings/1998.html [2] http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1999/04/19411 _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
