Hi,
I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his dicision.
> From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid, because of
following reasons:
1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs
than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to me plese)
2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own, rewriting qt one
to FSO one is worthless effort
3. where logs of significantly more useful, easier and non-destructive
goals to rich, i can suggest few:
3.1 switch back to X11. with new graphical subsystem performance this
will work great.
3.2 switch to newer qt versions
3.3 fix 100500 bugs left
3.4 add gta04 support<- most important
3.5 improve performance and usability
3.6 implement new features, like: 'geek' theme, sliding buttons in
answer screen
^^^ IMO this set can keep everyone busy for a while.
where is also no real benefit visible from switching to FSO. qtmoko will
become more complicated, more buggy, slower, harder to develop:(
I afraid i'll have to stay on non-FSO version forether. And certain,
this planned change worth more discussion. If someone wants FSO, better
to install it on debian or with SHR.
Gennady.
+1
Absolutely.
--
##############################################################
giacomo 'giotti' mariani
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key 0x99bfa859
O< ASCII ribbon campaign: stop HTML mail
www.asciiribbon.org
##############################################################
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
