Dmitry Chistikov, Oct. 02, 2011, 00:33 +0400: > Michael Sokolov, Sep. 30, 2011, 19:14 +0000: > > That's right, it doesn't. It is 30 y old and well predates those > > conventions. > > [...] > (For me, reading broken threads is a rather unpleasant activity, and so it > may be for a significant fraction of the community at large.)
Another bit, JFYI. RFC 2822 says: RFC> reply messages SHOULD have "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" fields" (the meaning of SHOULD is described in RFC 2119). Actually, I'm quite surprised that your mail client, even if 30-year-old, does not insert these fields, since they were described in RFC 724 as early as in 1979. -- Dmitry Chistikov _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
