Sure.

In the Antspam Administration, click on the "Options" tab and make sure to 
check the "Allow domains to override filter weights and actions". Then when you 
manage a domain, expand the "filtering" section and click on the "Spam 
Filtering" option. From there, click on the "Override spam settings for this 
domain" and edit the weights and actions any way you would like.

        Dean Lawrence
President
Internet Data Technology
Phone: 888-438-4381 x701
Web: www.idatatech.com <http://www.idatatech.com/>
Email: d...@idatatech.com
Programming | Database | Consulting | Training          



> On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Michael Cummins <mich...@wddx.net> wrote:
> 
> > If you want to use Declude per-domain setting, you can still certainly do 
> > so.
>  
> What I mean by that is – some of my customers want the subject line to be 
> marked at different values, and some don’t want the subject line rewritten at 
> all.
>  
> If SM was the one marking the subject line, I wouldn’t be able to take those 
> actions per domain, or could I?
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> - Michael Cummins
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 4:46 PM
> To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
> Subject: [MBF] Re: Using Declude and SmarterMail effectively
>  
> Michael,
>  
> I use a combination of both. In Declude, I only either just warn or delete, I 
> do not change the subject line or move to any other folders. The delete value 
> that I use is fairly high, so a message would have to fail a good number of 
> tests in Declude to be deleted. If a message fails this many tests, there 
> really isn't any reason to push it through the SmarterMail tests as well (at 
> least in my opinion).
>  
> The DKIM, DomainKeys, and DMARC tests are just that, additional tests. 
> There's really nothing overly special about them. So if a message passes 
> through Declude without being deleted, it's Declude test weight is added to 
> all my additional SmarterMail test values. I then use the SmarterMail filters 
> to determine what to do with the message based on it's final weight value. If 
> you want to use Declude per-domain setting, you can still certainly do so.
>  
> 
> Dean Lawrence
> President
> Internet Data Technology
> Phone: 888-438-4381 x701
> Web: www.idatatech.com <http://www.idatatech.com/>
> Email: d...@idatatech.com <mailto:d...@idatatech.com>
> Programming | Database | Consulting | Training 
>  
> 
>  
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Michael Cummins <mich...@wddx.net 
> <mailto:mich...@wddx.net>> wrote:
>  
> What is the best way to synergize the benefits of both Declude and
> SmarterMail?
> 
> If I understand correctly, by having all of the subject marking and deleting
> taking place inside of Declude, then I can easily have per-domain
> configuration.
> 
> If I take it out of Declude and set everything to Warn, then I can no longer
> configure things per domain, but I am perhaps missing out on some of the
> features SmarterMail brings to the table, yes?
> 
> I mean, if it was deleted by Declude, then it doesn't benefit from the DKIM,
> DomainKeys, DMARC you can play with in SmarterMail.
> 
> Am I thinking correctly?
> 
> Thanks! 
> 
> - Michael Cummins
> 
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>  the mailing list <community@mailsbestfriend.com 
> <mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com>>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <community-...@mailsbestfriend.com 
> <mailto:community-...@mailsbestfriend.com>>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <community-dig...@mailsbestfriend.com 
> <mailto:community-dig...@mailsbestfriend.com>>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <community-in...@mailsbestfriend.com 
> <mailto:community-in...@mailsbestfriend.com>>
> Send administrative queries to  <community-requ...@mailsbestfriend.com 
> <mailto:community-requ...@mailsbestfriend.com>>
> 

Reply via email to