As impled in my query, suspicion the toolset used is not legitimate for
today's use. I think you have further confirmed. The additional ideas are
appreciated

 

From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com]
On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 6:46 PM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF] Re: Abuse & Postmaster

 

Hi Martin,

 

There is no way at all for any external party (a black list, DNSSTUFF or a
recipient SMTP server) to determine whether inside your Imail or SmarterMail
configuration you defined a particular email address (such as
Postmaster@..., Abuse@... or Root@...) as a separate mailbox or as a
forwarding alias. All that's visible to the outside is whether your server
accepts an email address as valid - or not.

 

So - a few things are possible:

 

a)       A bug in the testing tool you are using, or

b)      Your mail server having rejected an email from the testing tools
SMTP relay because it fails some OTHER rule, or

c)       Your mail server's IP address currently being listed in one of the
"non-compliant servers" black list, and your testing tool is reporting THAT.

 

Outside of those most likely scenarios, there are also some servers that
don't care much about the "abuse" contact for your DOMAIN name, because the
assumption is that spammers will register new (or hack reputable) domain
names all the time. Instead, they use the "WHOIS" information of your
provider's IP block to ee if IT contains an abuse contact - since that would
be a much more likely "legitimate" abuse contact.

 

The problem comes in with SWIPing. When providers have various WHOIS entries
for countless delegated segments of their huge IP blocks, they don't always
bother to populate all those fields down the stream. While a human would
have the sense to follow the chain up to the ultimate parent organization
and readily find their official abuse contacts - it's not unusual for
attempted spam filters to fail miserably and consider the individual IP
block as missing an abuse contact.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

logo-rgb-178.png
      600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
      Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

 <http://www.hm-software.com/> http://www.HM-Software.com/  

Von: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] Im
Auftrag von Martin Margheim
Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 15:11
An: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Betreff: [MBF] Abuse & Postmaster

 

I have been working with the premise that postmaster and abuse email
accounts could be operated as alias email addresses. However, for whatever
reason, a check this morning using DNSTUFF's Professional Toolset results in
reporting no abuse or postmaster email exists.

 

Perhaps this is result of how the toolset checks for email addresses.
Afterall, it is a rather dated toolset and perhaps never been updated,
particularly since acquired by SolarWinds no longer a subscription DNS Tool.

 

Thoughts?

 

Martin

Reply via email to