http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings06102009
Minutes: Attendees: SteveSpeicher, AndreWeinand, SamitMehta, RobertElves, MikKersten, JayGillibrand? , SteveAbrams, RandyVogel Feedback and impressions from Rational Software Conference SteveAbrams OSLC was very well received across the board MikKersten also noticed the level of interested in OSLC RandyVogel many good discussions as well, including business partners SteveSpeicher witnessed interest at all levels: customers, integrators (other Rational product teams) AndreWeinand heard about OSLC from many people, were happy to see spec completed and products supporting Retrospective on 1.0 efforts: MikKersten Works well: implementations is key in making it all work Needs improvement: need for reference implementation for service providers, something easier to work with without requiring timely legal approvals, be good to have a task tracker and forum threads General discussion on involvement with additional implementors and spec involvement: all to take action to pursue this RandyVogel Works well: meetings and wikis all went well, as well as level our design feedback, sometimes it went in fair amount detail SamitMehta Needs improvement: startup for implementations access is needed, possibly looking at expanding scenarios to get more people involved ScottBosworth Works well: implementations working in progress with spec worked well and could Needs improvement: dealing with maturing as a site, across OSLC: shared components; share more info via group email AndreWeinand Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key Needs improvement: areas may be harder to adopt when specifications priorities and scenarios diverge from some product requirements. RobertElves Needs improvement: need for a test site (reference implementation) to get access to; better consideration of programatic consumption of the spec; would prefer a non-Web (non-JavaScript) version of the dialogs for consumption in tools like Eclipse SteveAbrams Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key; scope was key Needs improvement: could have spent more time to make it simpler; make sure products continue; common concepts challenges SteveSpeicher Works well: agreement on spec and impl in parallel Needs improvement: make sure discussions and work is all on wiki and public Next meeting 24 June 2009 12:00 ET Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
