> From: Lee J Reamsnyder/Durham/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected], > Date: 11/03/2011 01:14 PM > Subject: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors > Sent by: [email protected] > > I've > posted a table of OSLC consumers and providers on the OSLC website > (http://open-services.net/software/).
A few comments on this page: 1) It is called "Software", why not "Implementers"? If it is software, then should probably add a section for things like Eclipse Lyo. 2) The column titled "Supported Specifications". Supported may be too strong a word for some implementations. Perhaps just "Implemented Specs" or just "Specs" (and people will understand). 3) Something like a disclaimer and/or more descriptive text to introduce what is being presented. Like "OSLC implementations have not been validated by any 3rd party", etc 4) It would be nice if the product link actually linked to where the software documented/describes its OSLC support. To help "verify" that the entry really does have some OSLC support described. Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
