Hi, > Am 24.07.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Pavel Borecki <[email protected]>: > > https://www.pubpub.org/pub/direct-radio-introspection
indeed interesting reading. It resembles some of the measures included in the Neo900 design, but there is IMHO a conceptual difference. Neo900 provides on-board measurement units and assumes that the same software running on the main CPU can detect that there is something going on. This means the device is modified. The approach shown above focusses in pure monitoring of activities by a second software system. Designed completely independent. This looks to me like having implications on how reliable the approaches can (or can not) detect something. And in total, there is something which I ask myself for a while: how can such a monitoring device be tested / debugged? Is it possible at all to simulate a "critical" situation on the device to be monitored and verify that the detector triggers? Can I do that myself? This might make any such privacy measure useless if I can't even know if the monitor is working properly. BR, Nikolaus _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/community http://www.tinkerphones.org
