That's correct.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Carl Fyffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Yay! Something I can fix. The preferred way is to just use the before
> filters correct?
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Bruno Bornsztein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is 'worst-practices'! Actually, it's just cruft left over from
> > integrating AlteredBeast. If you find more like this, please let me know
> or
> > fix 'em up and submit a pull request.
> > Thanks!
> > Bruno
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Carl Fyffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Forgot the pastie for quick access to the code in question:
> >>
> >> http://pastie.org/258608
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Carl Fyffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> > AlteredBeast's PostController has before_filters: find_user,
> >> > require_current_user that are run for create and update, so why do
> >> > create and update both run User.find(params[:user_id]) when @user has
> >> > been populated already by the two before filters? This seems very
> >> > redundant. It is definitely repeated db calls. This may not matter
> >> > since db calls are cached per request now...
> >> >
> >> > In my application I am almost always going to need two bits of
> >> > information, the user and the company the user belongs to, is it valid
> >> > to have a single before_filter that populates those two instance
> >> > variables? Or should I follow the example of AlteredBeast?
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CommunityEngine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to