Will that allow a User and a Group to have different functionality if required? for example, lets say you didn't want a group to have a Photo Gallery.
Levi Rosol On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:54 PM, sachin kale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have implemented projecting a group as a 'user' > You can have a seperate model for relationship between group and > subscribers -> membership, which has group_id(i.e user_id projected as > group) and user_id(subscriber to the group) > This way we can have all the features for the group that are available to > user. > like group blog/photos/comments/home-page etc. > > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Levi Rosol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> So one of the next steps I need to take with CE is to implement some >> sort of Group functionality. The idea is that any user can create a >> Group. A Group will have nearly all of the same functionality that a >> User has in terms of a profile, comments, photos, friends (but called >> members), etc.. >> >> What are your thoughts on the best way to approach building this? I >> think because of how tightly everything is tied to the existing User, >> the only route to go with this is to create a new model from scratch >> and do a lot of copy/pasting to bring over the existing User >> functionality. >> >> Got a better way? Cause this doesn't seem very DRY. >> >> >> > > > -- > Sachin Kale > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommunityEngine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
