In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sep 6, 8:16 am, "Jukka Pakkanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Would have been very nice to know immediately when you made the decision of >> dropping Windows 2000 users from your supportes list... we have been >> patiently waiting for the fixes to the completely broken windows code for >> weeks, since it was supposed to come "very soon" and "in days"... and now we >> get a lakonic statement "W2K is no longer supported"... :( >> >> In a couple of weeks the ISC BIND has gone from "the best and most trouble >> free piece of software ever" to "useless" to us. That's sad. >> >> Well, need to start looking for other options, upgrading all our, and our >> clients DNS servers to W2K3 just to support the DNS software really is not >> an option. >> >> Jukka > >Yeah aint that a nice kickinthepants... Sorry no new bind for yous if >you arent made of moneybags and running the latest windoze! Guess we >will start looking at djbdns, it didnt have the bugs in the first >place. Or switch back to windozedns.. oh no.. did I say that??
Please note that this is not a bug in bind, but a bug in the underlying protocol. djbdns will have this bug. So too will the windows domain name server. Has a new version of djbdns been released? Will Microsoft be issuing a patch for Windows 2000? Windows 2000 is past end of life from Microsoft's point of view. > >disgruntled_used_to_be_bind_user -- Tom Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
